Legal Opinion

Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. Nix

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 19, 1929No. 3747PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLSON, O. J.

(after stating the case as above). It will be noted, on referring to the findings of the jury set out in the statement above, that they found, in response to the first one of the issues, that the motormen of both car No. 1 and No. 2 were guilty of actionable negligence in attempting to pass each other as they did; in response to the third one of the issues, that the motorman on car No. 1 was guilty of such negligence in starting his car up to make the turn on the curve after the motorman on No. 2 had started his ear up in attempting to make such a turn; and, in response to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. San Antonio, U G. R. Co. v. DawsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. StuartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Pullman Co. v. McGowanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co. v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Texas & N. O. R. v. RittimannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Regester v. LangCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Camillo Martinez O/B/O Yolanda Martinez v. Nabeel "Bill" Arafat D/B/A Texas Car Stereo, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API