Legal Opinion

Regester v. Lang

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 20, 1930No. 949PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStanford, J.

This is an appeal by H. W. Regester and H. H. Roberts, respective plaintiffs below in causes Nos¡ 16429 and 16444, v. C. Eugene Lang, which causes were consolidated by the trial court. From the verdict and judgment on the trial of the consolidated causes in favor of C. Eugene Lang, the said Regester and Roberts have appealed and will hereafter be referred to as appellants, and the said Lang as appellee. Appellant Regester’s suit was against appellee for specific performance of an alleged oral contract, by the terms of which it was alleged the said appel-lee agreed to convey to him, Regester,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Houston & T. C. Ry. Co. v. StevensonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  2. Emberlin v. Wichita Falls, R. & Ft. W. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  3. Rice v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Hardin v. MajorsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. GrabnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McClure v. FallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Robinson v. AshnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. BoverieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. MacDonald v. FollettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  5. Williams v. Merchants Fast Motor Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API