Legal Opinion

Hagen v. Silva

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 15, 1956No. Civ. 16598PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEVINE, J. pro tem. †

Judgment on a complaint to quiet title having been rendered in favor of plaintiff, defendants husband and wife, who claimed to be holders of a promissory note and of a deed of trust on the property, have appealed. The issue in the ease is whether or not full payment of the note was made by plaintiff, and this is to be decided by determining whether the person to whom payments amounting to the entire principal and interest were made, was the agent of defendants for the purpose of receiving these payments.

Plaintiff executed the note and deed of trust on March 30, 1943, to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wolf v. GallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Tobias v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Hyatt v. ColkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Marple v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Ayres v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Firato v. TuttleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Cignetti v. American Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Frey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Rinehart v. First Cupertino Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Stein v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API