Rinehart v. First Cupertino Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, J.
Plaintiff sought declaratory relief and decree quieting title, asserting that defendants had agreed to grant to plaintiff a one-fourth interest in real property in return for plaintiff’s services as broker in acquiring the land. Defendants’ answer denied plaintiff’s claims, and asserted title in themselves. Defendants also cross-complained to quiet title. The cross-complaint was dismissed during trial. Defendants had judgment that plaintiff take nothing by his complaint, and that title be quieted in defendants. Plaintiff appeals.
Respondent The First Cupertino Company is a limited partnership…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rickards v. NoonanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Warden v. StollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Ford v. Carew & EnglishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- French v. Orange County Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- In Re StrandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Doria v. International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Frey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Stein v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959