Legal Opinion

Rinehart v. First Cupertino Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 4, 1957No. Civ. 17399PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDraper, J.

Plaintiff sought declaratory relief and decree quieting title, asserting that defendants had agreed to grant to plaintiff a one-fourth interest in real property in return for plaintiff’s services as broker in acquiring the land. Defendants’ answer denied plaintiff’s claims, and asserted title in themselves. Defendants also cross-complained to quiet title. The cross-complaint was dismissed during trial. Defendants had judgment that plaintiff take nothing by his complaint, and that title be quieted in defendants. Plaintiff appeals.

Respondent The First Cupertino Company is a limited partnership…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rickards v. NoonanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Warden v. StollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Ford v. Carew & EnglishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. French v. Orange County Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. In Re StrandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Doria v. International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Frey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Stein v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API