City of Raymond v. Willapa Power Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pacific county, Mackintosh, J., entered October 19, 1916, dismissing an action for an injunction, after a trial before the court upon an agreed statement of facts.
1Opinion of the Court
On Rehearing.
Webster, J.
This case was originally heard and decided in Department Two. After the opinion was filed, which may be found in 98 Wash. 317, 167 Pac. 914, a petition for a rehearing was granted and the case was thereafter considered by the whole court. The facts, *279which are fully set forth in the departmental opinion, are correct with the exception that the court was in error in stating that the water to be diverted by respondent’s dam for power purposes would be returned to the stream at a point above the city’s contemplated intake pipes. By reference to the blue print or map which…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Colegrove Water Co. v. City of HollywoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Rigney v. Tacoma Light & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894
- Benton v. JohncoxWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- Hoyt v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- City of New Whatcom v. Fairhaven Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. NewcombCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- City of Raymond v. ArmstrongWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- State v. NewcombCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Ronald Peabody v. Jon TunisonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020