Legal Opinion
Abrams v. Millikin & Fitton Law Firm
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided May 21, 2003No. C-l-02-081PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SPIEGEL, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defen dant Millikin & Fitton Law Firm (doc. 22), Plaintiffs Memorandum in Opposition (doc. 25), and Defendant’s Reply (doc. 29).
BACKGROUND
The following facts have been derived from the allegations in Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint (doc. 14). This is a case concerning Plaintiffs discharge from her employment with Defendant Millikin & Fitton Law Firm (hereinafter “Millikin”) (Id.). Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint alleges that Millikin terminated her employment in September of 2001…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- William Grosjean v. First Energy Corporation Toledo Edison EnergyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Devore v. Rolls-Royce Energy Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
- Bolls v. South-Western Thomson LearningDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
- Grosjean v. First Energy CorpCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003