Legal Opinion

County of San Mateo v. Booth

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 26, 1982No. Civ. 48241PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RATTIGAN, Acting P. J.

Plaintiff and respondent County of San Mateo (the County) commenced an action against defendant and appellant Robert Lee Booth (defendant) to establish that he was the father of a minor whom the County had supported in its aid to families with dependent children (AFDC) program, and to obtain reimbursement of the funds the County had paid out. After a nonjury trial, the court entered a judgment which declared that defendant was the father of the minor and ordered him to reimburse the County in the sum of $8,819.11. Defendant appeals from the judgment.

The Pleadings…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream, Inc. v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. City and County of San Francisco v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. County of San Mateo v. DELL J.California Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. McCaskeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. County of Ventura v. StarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API