Legal Opinion

Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. McCarthy Bros.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 24, 1953No. 32695PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODMAN, District Judge.

On November 23, 1945 the Stabilization Administrator of the Office of War Mobilization and Reconversion announced his finding that “in order to obtain adequate supplies of green coffee without increasing coffee prices to the consumer or resuming coffee rationing, it is necessary to provide a temporary program for subsidizing imports of green coffee as an emergency measure to avoid a critical shortage of coffee for domestic civilian consumption.” To implement his finding, the Administrator authorized the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, a corporation chartered and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. JG Menihan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. United States v. National Football LeagueDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. United States v. New York Dock Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
  5. Bauman v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Utica Meat Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1955
  2. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. FaulknerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API