Legal Opinion
Bauman v. Aluminum Co. of America
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided October 27, 1944No. 3683APublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.
This is a motion made by the plaintiff for an order striking out the second, third, fourth and fifth defenses and “so much of the first defense as alleges contributory negligence of plaintiff as contained in the defendant’s amended answer on the ground that the same are not legal defenses and are insufficient in law upon the face thereof.”
The second defense contains the following paragraphs:
“Third: That the Defense Plant Corporation is a corporation formed as a governmental agency of the United States, formed for the purpose of construction of defense plants in the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. JG Menihan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. Piper Aircraft Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
- American Motorists Ins. Co. v. NapoliCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
- Seek v. EdgarDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. Foster Wheeler Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1947
- United States v. Cattaraugus CountyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.