Legal Opinion
Noonan v. Cellu Tissue Corp. (In Re Palmer Trucking Co.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 23, 1996No. 13-16819PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
HENRY J. BOROFF, Bankruptcy Judge.
Before the Court for determination is a “Motion for Summary Judgment, or Alternatively, Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Stay and Referral to the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities” (the “Motion”) filed by CST Office Products, Inc. (“Defendant” or “CST”), one of the defendants in the instant adversary proceeding. Through his complaint, David J. Noonan, the Chapter 7 Trustee in Bankruptcy (“Plaintiff’ or the “Trustee”) of Palmer Trucking Co., Inc. (the “Debtor”), seeks to collect from CST the difference between the amount…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- N. Parent, Inc. v. Cotter & Co. (In Re N. Parent, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Adams v. Hartconn Associates, Inc. (In Re Adams)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
- Cox v. Cox (In Re Cox)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
- Spookyworld, Inc. v. Town of Berlin (In Re Spookyworld, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Nickless v. Creare, Inc. (In Re Haverhill Technology Group)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.