Legal Opinion

Friedlander v. Union

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided May 10, 1957No. Civ. No. 8616PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

R. DORSEY WATKINS, District Judge.

This is a complaint for patent infringement brought by Thomas A. Friedlander (Friedlander), holder of United States Letters Patent No. 2,615,505, issued on October 28, 1952 to Friedlander, on an application filed October 22, 1948. Infringement by Lucas Brothers (Lucas) and others is alleged. Plaintiff prays that the patent be declared valid and that plaintiff is the owner thereof; that defendants have infringed the patent; that injunctions be issued against the defendants ; and for an accounting, costs and attorneys’ fees.

Substantially similar answers have…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  3. I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. American Fur Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Shepard v. CarriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spalding, Division of Questor Corp. v. AntoniousDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1975
  2. Morpul, Inc. v. Glen Raven Knitting Mill, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1965
  3. Mid-West Wire Products Co. v. Wall Tube & Metal Products Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API