Legal Opinion

A.F. Brown Electrical Contractor, Inc. v. Rhino Electric Supply, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 23, 2006No. G035694PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARONSON, J.

Defendants Rhino Electric Supply, Inc., and Tom Bentele appeal the trial court’s denial of their special motion to strike brought under the anti-SLAPP statute (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16). Defendants contend their filing of a stop notice 3 and other debt collection efforts constituted acts “in furtherance of the person’s right of petition or free speech under the United States or California Constitution in connection with a public issue,” (§ 425.16) and were absolutely privileged under the litigation privilege of Civil Code section 47, subdivision (b). Defendants also contend…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. DelfinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Kashian v. HarrimanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Dove Audio, Inc. v. Rosenfeld, Meyer & SusmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Baral v. SchnittCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Wallace v. McCubbinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Kolar v. Donahue, McIntosh & HammertonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. City of Industry v. City of FillmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Bel Air Internet, LLC v. Morales, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API