Legal Opinion

State v. . Nichols

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStagy, C. J.

Tbe purpose of tbis appeal is to test tbe constitutionality of ebap. 30, Public Laws 1937, being “An Act to Regulate tbe Business of Cleaning, Dyeing and/or Pressing.”

Tbe effort must fail on tbe instant record. S. v. Lueders, 214 N. C., 558.

In tbe first place, tbe defendant is charged witb a misdemeanor (if, indeed, be be charged witb any offense), and be was found not guilty in tbe municipal court on “a special verdict” without tbe intervention of a jury, wbicb amounted to an acquittal. S. v. Gamby, 209 N. C., 50, 182 S. E., 715. Tbis put an end to tbe matter, as tbe court bad jurisdiction…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rhyne v. . LipscombeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  2. State v. . LuedersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. State v. . CambySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. State v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  5. State v. . LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. CrabtreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. . CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. State v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. State v. EverettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API