Legal Opinion

Doty v. Bettis

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 16, 1997No. 97-109PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.

This appeal concerns the validity of a local-option election whereby the voters of Willis Township in Poinsett County were asked to decide whether Precinct 41 should become dry. The appellants, Garry and Patricia Doty, raise three arguments on appeal in support of their contention that the election results should be set aside. We affirm.

The underlying facts of this case are undisputed. In 1996, certain voters decided to circulate a petition that would place on the ballot an initiative to convert Precinct 41 of Willis Township in Poinsett County into a dry…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wheat v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
  2. Swanberg v. TartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Henard v. St. Francis Election CommitteeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Brown v. McDanielSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  5. Reichenbach v. SerioSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Womack v. FosterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Helton v. JacobsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Save Energy Reap Taxes v. ShawSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  4. City of Marion v. City of West MemphisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  5. City of West Memphis v. City of MarionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API