Legal Opinion
Kayanda v. Kamenir
Akron Municipal Court
Decided June 4, 1984No. 83 CVF 11576PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchneiderman, J.
The plaintiff, Peter Kayanda, filed a complaint against Bernard Kamenir, Nahmi Realty Company and Charles D. Bowman, claiming $6,500 for loss of personal property. At the trial, Kayanda orally amended his claim by reducing his prayer to $3,500, and on that date voluntarily dismissed Bowman.
Defendants, Kamenir and Nahmi Realty, denied any amount was due, and Kamenir filed a counterclaim, claiming unpaid rent in the sum of $3,110.
At all times pertinent herein Kame-nir was the owner, or a co-owner with full authority to act for the other owner, of the apartment building located at 509-511 Crosby…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Agricultural Ins. v. ConstantineOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- David v. LoseOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- Maloney v. General Tire Sales, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1973
- In Re KnightOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Loewenstine v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tabar v. Charlie's Towing Service, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Kim v. WongCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2022