Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Morton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 22, 1968No. 68SC46PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBritt, J.

Although plaintiffs make thirteen assignments of error, their crucial assignment is that the trial court committed error in allowing defendants’ motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit. We hold that the trial court properly allowed defendants’ motion.

Defendants contend that plaintiffs failed to show agency between Mrs. Lucy B. Johnson and the defendants, particularly the feme defendants; they also contend that plaintiffs’ attempt to impose a negative easement by oral agreement is in violation of the statute of frauds and is not enforceable.

Plaintiffs attempted to allege two causes of action…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Davis v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Davis v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Hege v. SellersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Weant v. McCanlessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. O'Donnell v. . CarrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Watson Electrical Construction Co. v. Summit Companies, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. Partin v. Carolina Power and Light Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. F-F Milling Co. v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  4. Peoples Service Drug Stores, Inc. v. MayfairCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Stainless Valve Co. v. Safefresh Technologies, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API