State v. Griffith
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
f 1 Aaron Griffith was convicted of possessing child pornography and dealing in child pornography. Claiming the court erred by denying his motion to suppress the search warrant and allowing the State to amend the information after both sides had rested, he appeals. We affirm the court’s order denying suppression of the warrant but reverse the late amendment of the information.
Kurtz, J.
¶2 Aaron Griffith hosted a party on the night of April 27, 2001. C.R. attended the party with J.T. Hewitt. C.R. was 16 years old at the time.
¶3 C.R. drank several beers at the party. She offered to pose for Mr.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. MendezWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. MendezWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. SeagullWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. PelkeyWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. ColeWashington Supreme Court · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. LaramieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. LaramieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. FrantzSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
- State v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.