Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Staten

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 2, 2008PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

STEVENS, J.:

¶ 1 This is an appeal from an order that denied Appellant’s petition to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia *1008County for a writ of certiorari. Appellant contends the Court of Common Pleas erred in denying his writ and motion for discharge based on the Commonwealth’s alleged violation of Pa.R.Crim.P. 1013, Prompt Trial — Municipal Court,1 because his Municipal Court trial commenced eight days beyond the 180 day Mechanical Run Date. As the record reveals the eight day overrun occurred despite both the Commonwealth’s due diligence in bringing Appellant to trial in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PrestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. FryeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WendelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Commonwealth v. BeaufortSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Com. v. Beaufort, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Com. v. Bowers, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Com. v. Farlow, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2025

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API