Reese v. Haggard

1. Under the general grounds of the motion for a new trial, counsel íot the defendant insist that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict with -respect to the special damages awarded for the loss of the automobile on the basis that it was totally destroyed; and also that the evidence was insufficient for the jury to find how much depreciation, less than total destruc tion, the plaintiff’s automobile had suffered as a result of the collision. We are in accord with this contention. The plaintiff alleged that his automobile was, prior to the collision of the fair market value of…