Wells v. Steinek
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGuerry, J.
1. Where the pleadings and the evidence raise the issue of whether or not the plaintiff by the exercise of ordinary care could have avoided the consequences of the defendant’s negligence, it is the duty of the trial judge to give in charge to the jury the law on this subject, without a request therefor. Seaboard Air-Line Ry. v. Bostock, 1 Ga. App. 189 (58 S. E. 136); Atlanta, K. & N. Ry. Co. v. Gardner, 122 Ga. 82 (49 S. E. 818); Deen v. Wheeler, 7 Ga. App. 507 (67 S. E. 212); *483Jackson v. Ga. R. &c. Co., 7 Ga. App. 644 (67 S. E. 898); Ga. Ry. &c. Power Co. v. Freeney, 22 Ga. App. 457 (96 S. E.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. GardnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Davis v. WhitcombCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Russell v. BayneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Olliff v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Davies v. West Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jones v. CloudCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Jackson v. MatlockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Earl v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. AzarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Sikes v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.