Legal Opinion

Reed v. Piper

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 3, 1978No. 55132PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Webb, Judge.

1. "Where an automobile owner elects not to make repairs to his damaged vehicle, the measure of damages is the difference in market value before and after the collision.” Rutledge v. Glass, 125 Ga. App. 549, 550 (2) (188 SE2d 261) (1972) and cits.

2. In the instant personal injury and automobile damage case Piper, who had elected not to make repairs to his automobile, indicated in his testimony that it did have some post-collision value but had "no idea” as to the amount. In view of the failure of proof as to this matter the trial court erred in denying Reed’s motion for directed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rutledge v. GlassCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  2. Reese v. HaggardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ackley v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  2. Corrosion Control, Inc. v. William Armstrong Smith Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Godowns v. CantrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. Standard Guaranty Insurance v. Advance Well Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. Casteel v. GaitherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API