Legal Opinion

In Re: Sears, Roebuck and Co. Front-Loading Washer Products Liability Litigation

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 3, 2018No. 1:06-cv-07023Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION In re: SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. FRONT-LOADING WASHER Case No. 06 C 7023 PRODUCTS LIABILITY Consolidated with Case Nos. LITIGATION 07 C 0412 and 08 C 1832 This Document Relates to CCU Claims Magistrate Judge Mary M. Rowland MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs filed a supplemental motion for attorneys’ fees to recover fees spent litigating their petition for attorneys’ fees in this Court and defending the award on appeal. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs’ Supplemental Motion for Attorneys’ Fees [629] is…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Baker Botts L.L.P. v. ASARCO LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. Kenneth Spegon v. The Catholic Bishop of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  4. Stephen Ustrak v. James W. FairmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  5. Bond v. StantonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API