Legal Opinion

Bond v. Stanton

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 19, 1980No. Nos. 79-1759, 79-1799 and 79-1800PublishedCited by 113 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.

The instant appeal in this lengthy litigation concerns a prevailing plaintiff’s entitlement to attorney’s fees under the Civil Rights Attorney’s Fees Awards Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. § 1988.

Plaintiffs, representing the class of persons under 21 years of age residing in Indiana who are eligible for Medicaid, originally brought this class action in 1973 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, challenging the failure of various Indiana state officials to adopt and implement an early and periodic screening, diagnosis and treatment (“EPSDT”) program for needy children as mandated by…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by113 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Gorenstein Enterprises, Inc., Sam Gorenstein, and David Gorenstein v. Quality Care-Usa, Inc. And David A. ScheinmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  4. Max I. Bittner v. Sadoff & Rudoy IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  5. John Furtado v. Harold BishopCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API