Legal Opinion
Candido Romo v. Jeff Largen
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 23, 2013No. 12-1870PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.
SUTTON, J. (pp. 677-87), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and in the judgment.
OPINION
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Candido Romo was sitting in the driver’s seat of a parked car, intoxicated, when he was approached by defendant Officer Jeff Largen. Largen arrested Romo for operating a vehicle while intoxicated, assertedly based on Largen’s observation of Romo’s having driven the car minutes earlier. Romo contends that he had not been driving. Romo filed a § 1983 suit claiming that Largen violated his constitutional rights and committed several intentional torts. The district…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Angelo DiLuzio v. Village of Yorkville OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Nicholas Roberson v. James TorresCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Blackmon v. SuttonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Derrick Bunkley v. City of Detroit, Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Kathryn Pollard v. City of Columbus, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.