Legal Opinion
Ackerman v. Novak
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 15, 2007No. 06-1464PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
Movant Edwin Mark Ackerman has filed a motion for leave to file a second or successive habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, requesting permission to file a third collateral challenge to his 1995 military conviction. Mr. Ackerman’s motion is dismissed as unnecessary.
I. Procedural Background
In 1995, Mr. Ackerman pleaded guilty in general “court-martial proceedings to rape and larceny in violation of Articles 120 and 121 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.” Ackerman v. Novak, 66 Fed.Appx. 158, 159 (10th Cir.2003). He was sentenced, in part, to life imprisonment with confinement…
3Cases cited23 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Schlesinger v. CouncilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Burns v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- O'Callahan v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States Ex Rel. Toth v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by27 opinions
- Prost v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Hale v. FoxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Stanko v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Alaimalo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Carr v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.