Griswold v. Huffaker
Supreme Court of Kansas
Motion for Rehearing. The facts appear in the opinion herein, filed April 9,1892.
1Per curiam
It is conceded that the injunction asked for by the plaintiff below should be denied, unless the premises levied upon were a part of his homestead at the time of the levy. In 1860 a strip 90 feet in width separated the two tracts of land which are claimed by plaintiff below as his homestead. This strip at that time was a street in Quindaro. If these 90 feet, or if 60 feet thereof, was a public street in Quindaro at the time of the levy, then the homestead did not extend on both sides of the same.
“Whenever several lots or pieces or parcels of land claimed to be held and occupied as a homestead…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Randal v. ElderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
- Griswold v. HuffakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
3Cited by4 opinions
- Clark v. CoxSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
- State ex rel. Griffith v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
- Commercial National Bank v. CarnahanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
- Wicker v. Williams, Et Ux.Supreme Court of Florida · 1939