Legal Opinion

Wicker v. Williams, Et Ux.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 19, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

of error brings for review judgment in ejectment in favor of the defendant.

The amended declaration appears from the record before us to have been as' follows:

“Come now the plaintiffs Caroline M. Wicker and Cyrus F. Wicker by their solicitor W. FI. Nollman, and for their Amended Declaration against the defendants Billie Williams and Mrs. Billie Williams, sue in an action of ejectment.
“1. Because the defendants are in possession of a certain tract or parcel of land situated, lying and being in said Highlands County, State of Florida, known and described as follows, to-wit: Several acres on Lake…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. H. Weston Lumber Co. v. Lacey Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Clark v. CoxSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  3. Shone v. BellmoreSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
  4. Randal v. ElderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  5. Buesing v. ForbesSupreme Court of Florida · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. TannerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  2. Kerrigan v. ThomasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  3. Tampa Mortgage & Title Co. v. SmytheDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  4. Wymbs v. Arvida Corp., Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Palm Beach County1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API