Legal Opinion
Matter of Garelick v. Rosen
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 27, 1937PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHubbs, J.
The claimant in this compensation case was employed by Fishkin, a subcontractor of Rosen, the appellant. Rosen was insured by the Maryland Casualty Company. Fishkin, the subcontractor, was insured by the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company. His policy, by its terms, expired on November 11, 1934, at 12:01 A. M. Prior to the date of its expiration, he applied to the United States Company for an extension for one month. An indorsement was attached to the policy extending it for one month “ to expire on December 11th.” On December 11, in the afternoon, the claimant was injured. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stroehmann v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Ira S. Bushey & Sons v. American InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Ludwig v. . the Jersey City Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
3Cited by15 opinions
- County of Columbia v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Birnbaum v. Jamestown Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Greulich v. MonninOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. GallinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- In re the Accounting of Lawyers Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.