Casey v. Richards
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. B. N. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTaggart, J.
Action on a contract to recover share of commissions for sale of real estate by one real estate agent from another. Judgment was for plaintiff, and defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
Defendant was the agent of the owner of an eighty-acre tract of land lying near the city of Los Angeles, for the sale of which he was to receive a commission. Plaintiff undertook to procure a purchaser for the land, and as evidence of the compensation agreed to be paid for such services to be rendered by him defendant executed and delivered to plaintiff a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gorham v. HeimanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Aldis v. SchleicherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hellings v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Howard v. D. W. Hobson Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
- Gray v. the Janss Investment Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Johnston v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Warren v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.