Legal Opinion
Gladys Laycock v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 6, 1956No. 19-17002PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHES, District Judge.
This is an appeal from an order dismissing appellant’s action for damages alleged to have been sustained as a proximate result of enforcement of the statutes and regulations relating to the sale of gold. [See: Gold Reserve Act of 1934, 48 Stat. 337, 31 U.S.C.A. § 440; 12 U.S.C.A. §§ 95a, 213; Executive Order 6260, as amended 12 U.S.C.A. following § 95a; United States Treasury Department Gold Regulations, 31 CFR, Part 54, §§ 54.1-55.2, 19 F.R. 4309-4316 (1954).]
Stated in summary, the allegations of appellant’s complaint are: that she is a substantial owner of certain…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Knox v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Hamilton v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Jacobs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Schillinger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Monarch Insurance Co. of Ohio v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
- Crain v. KrehbielDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1978
- Juda v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- Gladys Laycock v. Frank J. KenneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Gold Bondholders Protective Council, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.