Legal Opinion

Gladys Laycock v. Frank J. Kenney

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 21, 1959No. 16170_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JERTBERG, Circuit Judge.

Appellant is the owner of the majority interest in gold mining property situated in Grant County, Oregon, which she alleges has been extensively developed to a point where 234,000 tons of ore are blocked out. She further alleges that she has found, as many other gold mine operators in the United States have found, that the ore cannot be economically mined and processed at the current price set for gold under the regulations of the United States Treasury Department, with the result her mine cannot be operated at a profit and remains idle with practically no resale value…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mid-Fla Coin Exchange, Inc. v. GriffinDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1981
  2. Mow Sun Wong v. HamptonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1971
  3. Robert Sheldon Pike and Ryk Henry Brouwer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  4. California Teachers Ass'n v. Newport Mesa Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1971
  5. American Smelting & Refining Co. v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API