Legal Opinion

Hitchcock v. Hogan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Case made from Wayne. (Gartner, J.) Assumpsit. Both, parties' assign error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an action against the indorser of two promissory notes, — one of $100, and one of $102.50, —each of which matured Sunday, October 8, 1893. The note for $100 was presented for payment and protested for non-payment on Saturday, October 7, and the other note was presented for payment and protested on Monday, October 9. The circuit judge gave judgment on the note protested on Saturday, and found against the plaintiff on the note which was presented for payment on Monday.

The case is brought to this Court to obtain a construction of Act No. 185, Laws of 1893. The provisions of the act…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In the Matter of LandaalMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Schram v. Checker Service Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API