Legal Opinion
Cunha v. IntelliCheck, LLC
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 26, 2017No. Case No.17-cv-00597-JSTPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO DISMISS OR STRIKE
Re: ECF Nos. 24, 40
JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge
Defendants Chico Produce, Inc. d/b/a/ Pro Pacific Fresh, Inc. (“ProPacific”) and IntelliCheck, LLC (“IntelliCheck”) move to. dismiss or strike portions of Plaintiff James Cunha’s first amended complaint (“FAC”). ECF Nos. 24, 40. The Court will grant the motions in part and deny them in part.
I. BACKGROUND
This putative class action arises out of an employment background check that In-telliCheck performed on Cunha when he applied to be a produce delivery driver for…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc. v. Global Aerospace, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Bernuy v. Bridge Property Management Co.California Court of Appeal · 2023
- RingCentral, Inc. v. Nextiva, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021