Legal Opinion
Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc. v. Global Aerospace, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided July 10, 2020No. 2:17-cv-01515Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INC., No. 2:17-cv-01515-KJM-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 GLOBAL AEROSPACE, INC., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Defendant Global Aerospace, Inc. (“Global”) 1 moves, under Federal Rule of Civil 18 Procedure 12(c), for judgment on the pleadings of plaintiff Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc.’s third cause 19 of action for violations of California Business and Professions Code 17200 et seq. (“UCL 20 claim”). In short, Global contends (1) the UCL claim fails as a matter of law because Aerojet is…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.