Kimmerle v. City of Topeka
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Shawnee district court, division No. 2.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mason, J.:
The city of Topeka appeals from a judgment enjoining it from enforcing an assessment levied to pay for improving a street. The question presented is whether the petition asking for the improvment bore the signatures of enough resident owners to confer jurisdiction upon the commissioners to order it. The statute involved reads:
“No resolution to pave, macadamize, or grade, or repave, remacadamize,'or regrade, any street, lane or alley shall be valid unless a petition asking such improvement has been ordered spread upon the journal, which…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Hamilton v. HubbardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Tobin v. Chester & Lenoir N. G. R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1896
- Bogue v. Chicago, B. & Q. R.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1912
- Wood v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1839
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Board of County Commissioners v. City of OsborneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- State Ex Rel. Bowden v. JensenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. NorbergSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
- In Re Advisory Opinion to GovernorSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Dunsworth v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.