Legal Opinion
Wild v. Atlantic Refining Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 15, 1952No. 10509_1PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff as administratrix is suing for damages occasioned by the death of the decedent, her husband. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff and the trial judge, upon motion, set it aside and ordered judgment for the defendant n. o. v. The correctness of that action is the question on this appeal.
John Wild, a citizen of New Jersey, the decedent, was an experienced painter. He was foreman on a painting job for the Camden Painting Company, his employer. The job was the painting of the outside window sashes and exterior coping on No. 17 Boiler House of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kulka v. NemirovskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Vetter v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- McCarthy v. FerenceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Burckhalter v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Lentz v. Allentown Bobbin WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gottfried Baking Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- Hamm v. RamunnoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971
- Jones v. GoodmanDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1953
- Ramsey v. Mellon National Bank & Trust Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
- Filipek v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.