Judd v. Ball
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion
It is unnecessary to go beyond the decisions of this court in order to demonstrate conclusively that it was reversible error for the trial court to take the position that the measure of damages, in view of the facts of this case, was the market value of the land. Dalton v. Bowker, 8 Nev. 190; Hoffman v. Bosch,18 Nev. 360, 4 P. 703; Thomas v. Palmer, 49 Nev. 438, 248 P. 887.
It was error for the trial court to refuse to allow certain well-qualified witnesses to testify as to the value of the Ball ranch, and the comparative value of that portion received by the defendant and that portion of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- San Diego Land & Town Co. v. NealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Blagen v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1892
- Pittsburgh, Virginia & Charleston Railway Co. v. VanceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
- Cox v. BartonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
- De Freitas v. Town of Suisun CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.