Dam v. General Electric Co.
District Court, E.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
DRIVER, Chief Judge.
Defendant American Power and Light Company, hereafter called American, by its motion to quash the return of service of process and to dismiss the action, questions the sufficiency of the service and its own amenability to service, within the state of Washington. The action was commenced by the filing of the complaint, on July 16, 1952. The return of service shows that, on the following day, the summons and complaint were served upon American by handing copies thereof to the statutory agent of the Washington Irrigation and Development Company, at Vancouver, Washington.
The…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Bomze v. Nardis Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Botwinick v. Credit Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Farha v. Signal Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- Berkman v. Ann Lewis Shops, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Terry Carpenter, Limited v. Ideal Cement Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1954
- Douglas v. Bank of America NADistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020