Legal Opinion

United States v. Hart

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided January 17, 1962No. Civ. A. No. 2299PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM E. MILLER, Chief Judge.

After the Court filed its Memorandum of Decision on April 5, 1960, and before formal Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law were submitted to implement such memorandum, the defendants filed a motion on October 6, 1960 for leave to file an amendment to their answer to interpose an additional defense to the effect that the plaintiff, as co-surety, had relinquished property without defendants’ consent which would have satisfied the obligation in full, and that the defendants, as co-sureties with the plaintiff, were therefore discharged from liability upon their…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ottenheimer Publishers, Inc. v. Regal Publishers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
  2. Hart v. Federal Reserve BankDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1966
  3. Joseph W. Hart, Luella F. Hart and J. Carl Russell v. Federal Reserve Bank of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API