Legal Opinion

Davis v. Carmel Clay Schools

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided March 30, 2012No. 1:11-cv-00771-SEB-MJDPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCOVERY ORDER

MARK J. DINSMORE, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Interested Party the Office of the Prosecuting Attorney for the 24th Judicial District’s (the “Prosecutor”) Motion to Quash Subpoena [Dkt. 22] and Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Non-Parties, The Hamilton County Prosecutor’s Office and the City of Carmel Police Department, Pursuant to Plaintiffs’ Non-Party Subpoena Duces Tecum [Dkt. 68].

I. BACKGROUND

On October 7, 2011, Plaintiffs served a non-party subpoena on the Prosecutor requesting production of “[a]ll documents…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Frankenhauser v. RizzoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Tuite v. HenryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
  5. Madison Hobley v. Jon Burge, Robert Dwyer, City of Chicago, Appeal Of: Jones DayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. CRAIG v. CORNERSTONE TRADING GROUP, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2025
  2. Cooper v. RezutkoDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022
  3. In the Matter of the Subpoena Issued to Dethmers Manufacturing Company v. Tharun MittapalliSupreme Court of Iowa · 2023
  4. Logan v. South Bend City ofDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
  5. Logan v. South Bend City ofDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API