Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sather v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 7, 2014No. 1001494; A149547Published

1DissentEgan, J.

The majority concludes that, although claimant’s estate is entitled to the unpaid balance of claimant’s worker’s compensation award “whether eligibility therefor or the amount thereof have been determined,” the estate is not entitled to pursue that award. I respectfully dissent. I would conclude that the legislature, when it amended ORS 616.258 in 2009, intended to allow a deceased worker’s estate to pursue a claim in the same manner as that worker’s statutory dependents.

Prior to that amendment, ORS 656.218 provided, in part:

“(1) In case of the death of a worker entitled to compensation,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Brown v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. Walton v. Ramos Aasand & Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Edwards v. Cherry City Electric, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API