STATE Ex RANKIN v. INDUSTTRIAL COMMISSION
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By GEIGER, PJ. .
This is an original action in mandamus. After stating the parties the relator recites, that on the 1st of October, 1925. while m the usual course of his employment for a coal company, and while working with timbers at the bottom of a shaft he sustained a crushing injury to his left side, back and also, sustained internal injuries; that as a direct result, he has been left in a permanently crippled condition and is unable to work as a direct result.of such injury. : . \
He further states that he filed with the Industrial Commission his application for compensation and his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
- Noggle v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1935
- Metal Specialty Co. v. GregoryOhio Supreme Court · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.