Legal Opinion

STATE Ex RANKIN v. INDUSTTRIAL COMMISSION

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 5, 1941No. 3101Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By GEIGER, PJ. .

This is an original action in mandamus. After stating the parties the relator recites, that on the 1st of October, 1925. while m the usual course of his employment for a coal company, and while working with timbers at the bottom of a shaft he sustained a crushing injury to his left side, back and also, sustained internal injuries; that as a direct result, he has been left in a permanently crippled condition and is unable to work as a direct result.of such injury. : . \

He further states that he filed with the Industrial Commission his application for compensation and his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Noggle v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Metal Specialty Co. v. GregoryOhio Supreme Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API