Legal Opinion
State v. Forney
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided March 22, 1968No. 36733PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, C. J.
Defendant, tried without a jury by his consent, was convicted and sentenced for burglary. The only question presented here is the admissibility of evidence received as the result of a search of the defendant’s automobile. This same question was decided adversely to- the defendant by one judge of this court on the State’s appeal from an interlocutory order suppressing the evidence. State v. Forney, 181 Neb. 757, 150 N. W. 2d 915. The case is now before the full court for decision on the merits. We adhere in all respects to Judge Spencer’s decision therein.
The facts are not disputed, are fully…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Robert William Gorman v. United States of America, Edward Terrence Roche v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
- State v. McCartySupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. McKnightSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- State v. VirgilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- United States v. Maria Corral GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Upshaw v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. FrankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.