Legal Opinion
Farwell
United States Court of Claims
Decided July 1, 1954No. 526-52; No. 527-52PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Retired pay. Following the decisions in Alger v. United States, 126 C. Cls. 561, and Hottel v. United States, 128 C. Cls. 284, and on motion by the plaintiff in each case, which was .agreed.to by the defendant, it was ordered that each plaintiff was entitled to recover.’ Judgments suspended awaiting report as to the amounts due..Government Contracts. On stipulations by the respective parties agreeing to settlement and consenting to judgment in each case, it was ordered that judgments be entered for the respective plaintiffs, as follows:
On June 8, 1954
No. 48965. Eastport Steamship…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Stringer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
- United States v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Simon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1949
- Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
- Marr v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States of America, Libelant-Appellant v. Eastport Steamship CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- FarwellUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
- New Orleans & Northeastern RailroadUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- United States of America, Libelant-Appellant v. Eastport Steamship CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958