Legal Opinion

Stringer v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 1, 1950No. 47642PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Chief Judge.

This is a suit to recover the difference in pay between Grades CAF-13 and CAF-12, after September 16, 1944, on the ground that plaintiff’s reduction in grade on September 16, 1944, did not comply with the requirements of the Veterans’ Preference Act.

Plaintiff is a veteran entitled to the civil service benefits of the Veterans’ Preference Act of 1944, 58 Stat. 387, 5 U.S.C.A. § 851 et seq. On April 1, 1944, plaintiff, employed in the Dallas office of the Corps of Engineers, was promoted from Grade CAF-12, $4,600 per annum, to Grade CAF-13, $5,600 per annum. The legality of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Burnet v. Willingham Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Gadsden v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
  4. Wittner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
  5. Elchibegoff v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. A. Ernest Fitzgerald v. Robert E. Hampton, Chairman of United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Greenway v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  3. Chambers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
  4. Arthur B. Daub v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  5. Crocker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API