Honeycutt Contractors, Inc. v. Otto
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
Where Honeycutt failed to appeal the trial court’s 18 February 2009 order imposing discovery sanctions and its order denying its motion to set aside the 18 February 2009 order, neither of these orders are properly before this Court for appellate review. Where Bobby Honeycutt was never made a party to this action, the trial court had no jurisdiction to enter default judgment against him in his individual capacity.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
On 2 March 2006, Honeycutt Contractors, Inc. (Honeycutt) entered into a contract with William Otto and his wife, Ann Hendrickson…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hayman v. Ramada Inn, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Bromhal v. StottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
- In Re Pedestrian Walkway FailureCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Goss v. BattleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Polygenex International, Inc. v. Polyzen, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Abdo v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
- Abdo v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022