Legal Opinion
Rueffer v. Department of Agriculture & Markets
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 5, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcNaught, J.
The complaint, in substance, alleges that the plaintiffs are residents of the county of Broome; that each is engaged in interstate commerce in hauling coal from the State of Pennsylvania to the State of New York; that article 16-A of the Agriculture *805and Markets Law, as amended by chapter 579 of the Laws of 1937, regulating the transportation and hauling of coal by motor truck, is not applicable to the plaintiffs herein as interstate carriers of coal; that the Congress of the United States has not passed any enabling act authorizing or empowering the State of "New York to enact any statute,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- New State Ice Co. v. LiebmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Borden's Farm Products Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- District of Columbia v. ClawansSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- People v. . GillsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Eilenbecker v. District Court of Plymouth CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- La Borie v. HabesWebster Justice of the Peace Court · 1967
- People v. Dobbertin, New York County Courts1951
- People v. Rueffer, New York County Courts1938