Legal Opinion

La Borie v. Habes

Webster Justice of the Peace Court

Decided January 7, 1967Published

1Opinion of the CourtC. Benn Forsyth, J.

The respondent has demanded a jury trial in this proceeding pursuant to section 116 of the Agriculture and Markets Law. It has been held that the respondent is not entitled to a jury trial under the provisions of the Agriculture and Markets Law (Rueffer v. Department of Agriculture & Markets, 164 Misc. 803).

Proceedings under section 116 have been held to be a special civil proceeding (Matter of Foote, 129 Misc. 2). However, it is the opinion of this court that, even as such, they do not fall within the preservation of a right to a jury trial, as is fully set forth in CPLR 4101.

The statute,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Foote, New York County Courts1927
  2. Rueffer v. Department of Agriculture & MarketsNew York Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API