La Borie v. Habes
Webster Justice of the Peace Court
1Opinion of the CourtC. Benn Forsyth, J.
The respondent has demanded a jury trial in this proceeding pursuant to section 116 of the Agriculture and Markets Law. It has been held that the respondent is not entitled to a jury trial under the provisions of the Agriculture and Markets Law (Rueffer v. Department of Agriculture & Markets, 164 Misc. 803).
Proceedings under section 116 have been held to be a special civil proceeding (Matter of Foote, 129 Misc. 2). However, it is the opinion of this court that, even as such, they do not fall within the preservation of a right to a jury trial, as is fully set forth in CPLR 4101.
The statute,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re Foote, New York County Courts1927
- Rueffer v. Department of Agriculture & MarketsNew York Supreme Court · 1937