Legal Opinion

Champagne v. United States

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1994No. Civ. 930215PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESCHKE, Justice.

We consider the effect of comparative fault on a medical provider’s tort liability for treating a patient with suicidal ideas when the patient commits suicide. Under NDRAppP 47 the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit certified questions of law to this court:(1) Is a suicide victim’s fault to be considered under North Dakota’s Comparative Fault Statutes, § 32-03.2-01 and 02; and(2) Is any fault of the suicide victim attributable to the plaintiffs Debra Champagne and Richard Champagne who are the parents and surviving heirs of the suicide victim and institute…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Molton v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. Cowan v. DoeringSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  3. Hickey v. ZezulkaMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Anderson v. GaileyIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  5. First Trust Co. of North Dakota v. Scheels Hardware & Sports Shop, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. White Ex Rel. Estate of White v. LawrenceTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Hurt v. FreelandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. JCW Electronics, Inc. v. GarzaTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Rodenburg v. Fargo-Moorhead Young Men's Christian Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Stewart v. RyanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API