Legal Opinion

DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Morrow

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 7, 2004No. 1021866 and 1021977PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DaimlerChrysler Corporation ("Chrysler") and Akin Ford/Chrysler, Inc. of Winder, Georgia ("Akin"), appeal from a judgment in favor of David Morrow awarding compensatory damages and attorney fees in Morrow's action against Chrysler and Akin alleging breach of express and implied warranties. Morrow cross-appeals from a summary judgment for Chrysler and Akin with respect to his fraudulent-suppression claim. In the appeal (case no. 1021866), we reverse and remand. In the cross-appeal (case no. 1021977), we affirm.

This dispute arose following Morrow's purchase from Akin of a Dodge Ram 3500 pickup…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McGowan v. Chrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  2. American Nat. Fire Ins. Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Mason v. Chrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  4. Lipham v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  5. Ag-Chem Equip. Co. v. LIMESTONE FARMERS CO-OPSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  2. Freightliner v. Whatley Contract CarriersSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  3. Blackmon v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  4. Bishop v. Bombardier, Inc.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 2005
  5. Parsons & Whittemore Enterprises Corp. v. Cello Energy, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API